{"id":1002,"date":"2008-10-07T16:11:52","date_gmt":"2008-10-07T15:11:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ospublish.constantvzw.org\/?p=1002"},"modified":"2008-10-08T10:38:33","modified_gmt":"2008-10-08T09:38:33","slug":"doubt-critique-reason-hope","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ospublish.constantvzw.org\/blog\/texts\/doubt-critique-reason-hope","title":{"rendered":"doubt, critique, reason, hope"},"content":{"rendered":"
For everyone (like me) who keeps re-reading the 1992 edition of Robin Kinross’ Modern Typography: an essay in critical history<\/em>… his revised edition<\/a> (published in 2004) ends in an interestingly different way*:<\/p>\n “The phrase \u2018democratization of typography\u2019 has become common, referring to the wide availability of the tools of production for type and typographic design. One may take this with some skepticism: after all, for the majority, the generation and production of these tools is still largely in the hands of a few corporations \u2014 though the open source software movement may provide an alternative.<\/em>
\nIf democracy implies a spreading of power to the people, this is the wrong description of what is going on here: it is more a simple spreading of typography among the masses. The astonishing development in this period has not been the contribution of any designer or writer, but rather the spread of the means of making sophisticated typography to anyone with a computer. The domain of typography has been opened up, as never before, and there is a much wider interest in the activity now than there was even twenty years ago. (…) The great negative of the modern \u2014 irrevocable and disastrous damage to the natural world \u2014 gathers terrifying pace. Enlightenment thus proceeds, amid much babble and confusion. The watchwords remain: doubt, critique, reason, hope.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n